Human cloning has received until now little serious and careful scientific and ethical attention as it has been typically dismissed as a fiction of science. However, it still stirs deep for the articulation, revulsion and uneasiness in several people. Any form of ethical assessment of human cloning at this point can be considered provisional and tentative. Fortunately, the technology and science of human cloning has not yet been achieved in hand and therefore, a professional and public debate is quite possible without the need for a quick and precipitated policy response. The ethical pros and cons of human cloning can be considered to be sufficiently balanced and quite uncertain as there are not any ethically decisive case either for or against in the process of giving the permit for doing it or not. Gaining access to the human cloning can be brought within the moral right for the reproductive freedom. However, the circumstances of its usage can have significant benefits appearing for the first time in an infrequent manner. It is not a central component of the moral right to reproductive freedom and it serves no significant or for the social needs. On the other hand, in contrary to the pronouncements of several opponents, human cloning seems not to be the violation of the human rights or moral rights.