Name: A Neoliberal Revolution?: Thatcherism and the Reform of British Pensions (en Inglés)
Price: 58280.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Davies, Aled; Freeman, James; Pemberton, Hugh
ISBN: 9781526198006

portada A Neoliberal Revolution?: Thatcherism and the Reform of British Pensions (en Inglés)

A Neoliberal Revolution?: Thatcherism and the Reform of British Pensions (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Manchester University Press

Autor

Davies, Aled; Freeman, James; Pemberton, Hugh

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

416

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781526198006

A Neoliberal Revolution?: Thatcherism and the Reform of British Pensions (en Inglés)

Davies, Aled; Freeman, James; Pemberton, Hugh (Autor) · Manchester University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 11 a 16 días háb.

$ 116.560$ 58.280

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 58.280

Llega entre el 03 Ago y el 10 Ago a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "A Neoliberal Revolution?: Thatcherism and the Reform of British Pensions (en Inglés)"

This book examines the Thatcher government's attempt to revolutionise Britain's pensions system in the 1980s and create a nation of risk-taking savers with an individual stake in capitalism. Drawing upon recently-released archival records, it shows how the ideas motivating these reforms journeyed from the writings of neoliberal intellectuals into government and became the centrepiece of a plan to abolish significant parts of the UK's welfare state and replace these with privatised personal pensions. Revealing a government that veered between political caution and radicalism, the book explains why this revolution failed and charts the malign legacy left by the evolutionary changes that ministers salvaged from the wreckage of their reforms. The book contributes to understanding of policy change, Thatcherism, and international neoliberalism by showing how major reforms to social security could reflect neoliberal thought and yet profoundly disappoint their architects.