Name: Analysis of the Criminalisation of Homotransphobia After the Change Promoted (en Inglés)
Price: 53910.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: João Matheus Amaro De Sousa
ISBN: 9786208263591

portada Analysis of the Criminalisation of Homotransphobia After the Change Promoted (en Inglés)

Analysis of the Criminalisation of Homotransphobia After the Change Promoted (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Our Knowledge Publishing

Autor

João Matheus Amaro De Sousa

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9786208263591

Analysis of the Criminalisation of Homotransphobia After the Change Promoted (en Inglés)

João Matheus Amaro De Sousa (Autor) · Our Knowledge Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 21 a 25 días háb.

$ 107.820$ 53.910

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 53.910

Llega entre el 19 Ago y el 25 Ago a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Analysis of the Criminalisation of Homotransphobia After the Change Promoted (en Inglés)"

In Direct Action for Unconstitutionality by Omission (ADO) No. 26/DF, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) recognised the legislative delay in implementing the mandates to criminalise homotransphobia. On this occasion, the STF developed a concept of racism that includes prejudice and discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, sex, etc. In effect, the Court ruled that Law 7.716/1989 would apply until the advent of a specific normative act. However, this was amended by Law No. 14,532/2023 to separate racial slurs from prejudiced slurs in the criminal code, while reallocating racial slurs in the legislation to combat racism without making express reference to any of the elements of human sexuality. In this context, we seek to answer the central question: does the failure to include homotransphobia in the amendment made by Law 14.532/2023 to Law 7.716/1989 represent a backlash effect or is it an unintentional silence on the part of the legislator? In the end, it is concluded that the absence of express mention in the legislative amendment does not consist of the aforementioned effect, but an acquiescence, albeit tacit, of the jurisprudential interpretation of the term racism.