Name: Controversies in Clinical Thyroidology (en Inglés)
Price: 94960.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Hamburger, J. I. ; Miller, J. M.
ISBN: 9781461259183

portada Controversies in Clinical Thyroidology (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Springer

Autor

Hamburger, J. I. ; Miller, J. M.

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

306

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

23.4 x 15.6 x 1.7 cm

Peso

0.45 kg.

ISBN13

9781461259183

Categorías

El metabolismo
Endocrinología

Controversies in Clinical Thyroidology (en Inglés)

Hamburger, J. I. ; Miller, J. M. (Autor) · Springer · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 94.960

$ 131.890

Ahorras: $ 36.930

28% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 19 de Julio y el Miércoles 31 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Controversies in Clinical Thyroidology (en Inglés)"

"Man's natural instinct, in fact, is never toward what is sound and true. It is toward what is specious and false . . . The ideas that conquer the race most rapidly and arouse the wildest enthusiasm and are held most tenaciously are precisely the ideas that are most insane. This has been true since the first 'advanced' gorilla put on underwear, cultivated a frown and began his first lecture tour, . . . " H. L. Mencken, from Meditation On Meditation in the Smart Set, June, 1920 pp 45-46 In our opinion there is no field of clinical medicine in such a state of dynamic disequilibrium as clin- ical thyroidology. Thyroid diseases are very common. The moderately complex but easily understandable physiological interrelationships between the thyroid, pituitary and hypothalamus have provided stimuli for the application of mod- ern technology in the development of an array of diagnostic procedures. Although therapeutic methods have been more stable, and recent advances more limited, their application by phy- Joel I. Hambufl er. M. D. sicians representing different disciplines has pro- vided an ample basis for the expression of differ- ing viewpoints. Unfortunately there are few opportunities for in-depth exploration of different attitudes and experience relevant to issues of current interest. The review process employed by medical journals often seems to stifle the expression of controver- sial viewpoints.