Name: Decolonizing Palestine: Hamas Between the Anticolonial and the Postcolonial (en Inglés)
Price: 42370.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Sen Somdeep
ISBN: 9781501752742

portada Decolonizing Palestine: Hamas Between the Anticolonial and the Postcolonial (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cornell University Press

Autor

Sen Somdeep

Año

2020

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

186

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781501752742

Categorías

Israel
Historia de oriente próximo

Decolonizing Palestine: Hamas Between the Anticolonial and the Postcolonial (en Inglés)

Sen Somdeep (Autor) · Cornell University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 42.370

$ 70.620

Ahorras: $ 28.250

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Reino Unido (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 19 de Junio y el Jueves 27 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Decolonizing Palestine: Hamas Between the Anticolonial and the Postcolonial (en Inglés)"

In Decolonizing Palestine, Somdeep Sen rejects the notion that liberation from colonialization exists as a singular moment in history when the colonizer is ousted by the colonized. Instead, he considers the case of the Palestinian struggle for liberation from its settler colonial condition as a complex psychological and empirical mix of the colonial and the postcolonial. Specifically, he examines the two seemingly contradictory, yet coexistent, anticolonial and postcolonial modes of politics adopted by Hamas following the organization's unexpected victory in the 2006 Palestinian Legislative Council election. Despite the expectations of experts, Hamas has persisted as both an armed resistance to Israeli settler colonial rule and as a governing body. Based on ethnographic material collected in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Israel, and Egypt, Decolonizing Palestine argues that the puzzle Hamas presents is not rooted in predicting the timing or process of its abandonment of either role. The challenge instead lies in explaining how and why it maintains both, and what this implies for the study of liberation movements and postcolonial studies more generally.