Name: Does the law Morally Bind the Poor? Or What Good's the Constitution When you Can't buy a Loaf of Bread? (Critical America) (en Inglés)
Price: 138590.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: R. George Wright
ISBN: 9780814792940

portada Does the law Morally Bind the Poor? Or What Good's the Constitution When you Can't buy a Loaf of Bread? (Critical America) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Nyu Press

Autor

R. George Wright

Año

1996

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

228

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

0814792944

ISBN13

9780814792940

Categorías

Servicios de policía y seguridad

Does the law Morally Bind the Poor? Or What Good's the Constitution When you Can't buy a Loaf of Bread? (Critical America) (en Inglés)

R. George Wright (Autor) · Nyu Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 138.590

$ 230.990

Ahorras: $ 92.400

40% descuento

Cantidad
Estado: Nuevo
Quedan 100+ unidades

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 28 de Mayo y el Viernes 07 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Does the law Morally Bind the Poor? Or What Good's the Constitution When you Can't buy a Loaf of Bread? (Critical America) (en Inglés)"

Consider the horror we feel when we learn of a crime such as that committed by Robert Alton Harris, who commandeered a car, killed the two teenage boys in it, and then finished what was left of their lunch. What we don't consider in our reaction to the depravity of this act is that, whether we morally blame him or not, Robert Alton Harris has led a life almost unimaginably different from our own in crucial respects. In Does Law Morally Bind the Poor? or What Good's the Constitution When You Can't Buy a Loaf of Bread?, author R. George Wright argues that while the poor live in the same world as the rest of us, their world is crucially different. The law does not recognize this difference, however, and proves to be inconsistent by excusing the trespasses of persons fleeing unexpected storms, but not those of the involuntarily homeless. He persuasively concludes that we can reject crude environmental determinism without holding the most deprived to unreasonable standards.