Name: Eve/Eʋe: Numerical Coincidence Or Historical Vacuum?: Why Is eve [number two] in Aja-Tado Phonemically And Semantically That Si (en Inglés)
Price: 35110.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Toulassi, Boniface
ISBN: 9781719829496

portada Eve/Eʋe: Numerical Coincidence Or Historical Vacuum?: Why Is eve [number two] in Aja-Tado Phonemically And Semantically That Si (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Boniface Toulassi

Editorial

Independently Published

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 0.4 cm

Peso

0.11 kg.

ISBN13

9781719829496

Categorías

Lenguas africanas
Aprendizaje de idiomas

Eve/Eʋe: Numerical Coincidence Or Historical Vacuum?: Why Is eve [number two] in Aja-Tado Phonemically And Semantically That Si (en Inglés)

Boniface Toulassi (Autor) · Independently Published · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 35.110

$ 48.770

Ahorras: $ 13.660

28% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 29 de Julio y el Jueves 08 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Eve/Eʋe: Numerical Coincidence Or Historical Vacuum?: Why Is eve [number two] in Aja-Tado Phonemically And Semantically That Si (en Inglés)"

At times, simple things are not the simplest to explain. To be specific, there is no other language on earth where number two is called eve except with the Aja-Tado people group in West Africa. Curiously, the second human being created by God, according to Biblical accounts, is called Eve. Here is the puzzle: How come that eve, in pre-colonial Eʋè, is semantically and phonemically like the Biblical Eve? Numerical coincidence or historical vacuum? Now, how to explain the similitude between the Biblical Eve and eve [the number two] in Aja-Tado language is the premise of this book. There should be a path to explore: deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process by which we bring together different pieces of knowledge and infer conclusions that were only latent or implicit in what we already believed (Evans, Handley, Harper, 2001, p. 935). Could Eve/Eʋè be a numerical coincidence or ethnographic drama?