Name: Evolution of the Judicial Opinion: Institutional and Individual Styles (en Inglés)
Price: 76260.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: William D. Popkin
ISBN: 9780814767269

portada Evolution of the Judicial Opinion: Institutional and Individual Styles (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Nyu Press

Autor

William D. Popkin

Año

2007

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

301

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Peso

ISBN

0814767265

ISBN13

9780814767269

Categorías

Proceso civil del ordenamiento jurídico

Evolution of the Judicial Opinion: Institutional and Individual Styles (en Inglés)

William D. Popkin (Autor) · Nyu Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 76.260

$ 152.520

Ahorras: $ 76.260

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 31 de Mayo y el Miércoles 12 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Evolution of the Judicial Opinion: Institutional and Individual Styles (en Inglés)"

In this sweeping study of the judicial opinion, William D. Popkin examines how judges' opinions have been presented from the early American Republic to the present. Throughout history, he maintains, judges have presented their opinions within political contexts that involve projecting judicial authority to the external public, yet within a professional legal culture that requires opinions to develop judicial law through particular institutional and individual judicial styles.Tracing the history of judicial opinion from its roots in English common law, Popkin documents a general shift from unofficially reported oral opinions, to semi-official reports, to the U.S. Supreme Court's adoption in the early nineteenth century of generally unanimous opinions. While this institutional base was firmly established by the twentieth century, Popkin suggests that the modern U.S. judicial opinion has reverted—in some respects—to one in which each judge expresses an individual point of view. Ultimately, he concludes that a shift from an authoritative to a more personal and exploratory individual style of writing opinions is consistent with a more democratic judicial institution.