Name: Explaining Right and Wrong: A New Moral Pluralism and Its Implications (en Inglés)
Price: 185870.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Sachs, Benjamin
ISBN: 9781138307353

portada Explaining Right and Wrong: A New Moral Pluralism and Its Implications (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Benjamin Sachs

Editorial

Routledge

Año

2017

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

200

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781138307353

N° edición

Categorías

Filosofía ética y moral

Explaining Right and Wrong: A New Moral Pluralism and Its Implications (en Inglés)

Benjamin Sachs (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Dura

Libro Físico

$ 185.870

$ 309.780

Ahorras: $ 123.910

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Reino Unido (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 10 de Julio y el Lunes 22 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Explaining Right and Wrong: A New Moral Pluralism and Its Implications (en Inglés)"

Explaining Right and Wrong aims to shake the foundations of contemporary ethics by showing that moral philosophers have been deploying a mistaken methodology in their efforts to figure out the truth about what we morally ought to do. Benjamin Sachs argues that moral theorizing makes sense only if it is conceived of as an explanatory project and carried out accordingly. The book goes on to show that the most prominent forms of moral monism--consequentialism, Kantianism, and contractarianism/contractualism--as well as Rossian pluralism, each face devastating explanatory objections. It offers in place of these flawed options a brand-new family of normative ethical theories, non-Rossian pluralism. It then argues that the best kind of non-Rossian pluralism will be spare; in particular, it will deny that an action can be wrong in virtue of constituting a failure to distribute welfare in a particular way or that an action can be wrong in virtue of constituting a failure to rescue. Furthermore, it also aims to show that a great deal of contemporary writing on the distribution of health care resources in cases of scarcity is targeted at questions that either have no answers at all or none that ordinary moral theorizing can uncover.