Name: Is the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission a Sham? The Public Needs to Know (en Inglés)
Price: 28240.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Dixon, Curtis
ISBN: 9781478749899

portada Is the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission a Sham? The Public Needs to Know (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Curtis Dixon

Editorial

Outskirts Press

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

194

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 1.0 cm

Peso

0.27 kg.

ISBN13

9781478749899

Categorías

Memorias bibliográficas
Derechos humanos

Is the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission a Sham? The Public Needs to Know (en Inglés)

Curtis Dixon (Autor) · Outskirts Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

$ 28.240

$ 47.070

Ahorras: $ 18.830

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 31 de Mayo y el Miércoles 12 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Is the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission a Sham? The Public Needs to Know (en Inglés)"

The EEO investigator's comments throughout her letter dismissing my charge clearly showed that she only focused on information that would lead to dismissing my charge and protecting the respondent at any cost, even her reputation as a competent and objective EEO investigator. In my opinion, the most severe lack of impartiality on the part of the investigator came when she requested rebuttal evidence from me, but she refused to use any of the evidence that I sent her because my documented evidence proved that most of what she had written to dismiss my charge was false. Reconsider means to reevaluate, especially with a view to change of decision or action, not reinvestigate and uphold, but the district EEOC director defined it as an opportunity for the agency to secure and evaluate additional evidence regarding my claims and the employer's defenses even though the employer's initial defenses were false and my defenses supported a determination in my favor.