Name: Natural law Jurisprudence in U. S. Supreme Court Cases Since roe v. Wade (Anthem Studies in Law, Ethics and Jurisprudence) (en Inglés)
Price: 160880.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Nemeth, Charles P.
ISBN: 9781785272059

portada Natural law Jurisprudence in U. S. Supreme Court Cases Since roe v. Wade (Anthem Studies in Law, Ethics and Jurisprudence) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Charles P. Nemeth

Editorial

Anthem Press

Año

2020

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

236

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 1.8 cm

Peso

0.52 kg.

ISBN13

9781785272059

Categorías

Metodología y filosofía del derecho
Filosofía ética y moral

Natural law Jurisprudence in U. S. Supreme Court Cases Since roe v. Wade (Anthem Studies in Law, Ethics and Jurisprudence) (en Inglés)

Charles P. Nemeth (Autor) · Anthem Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 160.880

$ 223.440

Ahorras: $ 62.560

28% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 13 de Junio y el Martes 25 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Natural law Jurisprudence in U. S. Supreme Court Cases Since roe v. Wade (Anthem Studies in Law, Ethics and Jurisprudence) (en Inglés)"

"Natural Law and the US Supreme Court since Roe v. Wade" examines US Supreme Court cases which highlight, feature and illuminate some facet of natural law reasoning since the court's decree in Roe v. Wade. For most of our constitutional and legal history, there has been an exhilarating debate about whether natural law that commands or encourages certain legal resolutions--even from the time of the Founders. Most would concur that the legal philosophy of Jefferson and other Founders favored a natural law basis for this republic and its corresponding rights. And while the proposed text accepts that the concept and understanding of natural law reasoning has both supporters and detractors in contemporary settings, earlier Supreme Court rulings on controversial subject matter used natural law language with regularity. Since the 1970s, the idea of a perennial, immutable and unassailable natural law has lost favor. And given the recent surge in controversial case laws and conflicting decisions on highly charged topics, a return to first principles grounded in nature and natural law might be beneficial. Indeed, the proposed research hopes to gauge its current relevancy, usage and reliance in more modern judicial cases.