Name: Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)
Price: 162810.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Henckels, Caroline
ISBN: 9781107087903

portada Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Caroline Henckels

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Año

2015

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

266

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 1.6 cm

Peso

0.53 kg.

ISBN13

9781107087903

Categorías

Derecho internacional
Derecho del mercado bursátil

Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)

Caroline Henckels (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 162.810

$ 271.350

Ahorras: $ 108.540

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 31 de Mayo y el Viernes 07 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)"

In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states.