Name: Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)
Price: 61700.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Caroline Henckels
ISBN: 9781107458178

portada Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)

Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

Caroline Henckels

Año

2018

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

266

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781107458178

Categorías

Derecho internacional

Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)

Caroline Henckels (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 11 a 15 días háb.

$ 123.390$ 61.700

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 61.700

Llega entre el 28 Jul y el 03 Ago a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)"

In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states.