Name: Solving the Puzzle of Interest Group Litigation (en Inglés)
Price: 94520.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Andrew Jay Koshner
ISBN: 9780313305832

portada Solving the Puzzle of Interest Group Litigation (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Greenwood Press

Autor

Andrew Jay Koshner

Año

1998

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

144

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

0313305838

ISBN13

9780313305832

Categorías

Proceso civil del ordenamiento jurídico

Solving the Puzzle of Interest Group Litigation (en Inglés)

Andrew Jay Koshner (Autor) · Greenwood Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 94.520

$ 189.030

Ahorras: $ 94.510

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 06 de Junio y el Martes 18 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Solving the Puzzle of Interest Group Litigation (en Inglés)"

Koshner explores the increase in interest group participation before the U.S. Supreme Court. Since 1953, when less than 13 percent of the Court's full opinion cases were accompanied by friend of the court briefs, there has been a steady increase in interest group litigation. By the 1993 term, interest groups participated in 92 percent of the cases brought before the Supreme Court. While asking whether the rise in interest group activity in this supposedly independent arena should concern us, Koshner attempts to solve the fascinating political puzzle of this tremendous growth. He begins with the growth of interest group participation and asks, quite simply, why? In answering this question, Koshner draws on a series of studies that focus primarily on individual groups and their litigation decisions. He then uses them to explore the macro-level trends that pervade the relationship between the Supreme Court and interest groups. In particular, Koshner studies the roles of four important groups: the Court, Congress, the executive branch, and the interest groups themselves. Within each, he finds a series of changes or shifts in policy that begins to answer the puzzle, and examines his conclusions within the context of First Amendment church-state cases. Students, scholars, and other researchers dealing with contemporary public law issues will find this work of particular value.