Name: Substantive Protection Under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)
Price: 72250.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Bonnitcha, Jonathan
ISBN: 9781107615953

portada Substantive Protection Under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Jonathan Bonnitcha

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Año

2016

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

434

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 2.2 cm

Peso

0.58 kg.

ISBN13

9781107615953

Categorías

Derecho internacional
Derecho del mercado bursátil

Substantive Protection Under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)

Jonathan Bonnitcha (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 72.250

$ 111.150

Ahorras: $ 38.900

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 18 de Junio y el Martes 25 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Substantive Protection Under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (en Inglés)"

Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties provides the first systematic analysis of the consequences of the substantive protections that investment treaties provide to foreign investors. It proposes a new framework for identifying and evaluating the costs and benefits of differing levels of investment treaty protection, and uses this framework to evaluate the levels of protection for foreign investors implied by different interpretations of the fair and equitable treatment and indirect expropriation provisions of investment treaties. The author examines the arguments and assumptions of both supporters and critics of investment treaties, seeks to test whether they are coherent and borne out by evidence, and concludes that the 'economic' justifications for investment treaty protections are much weaker than is generally assumed. As such, the 'economic' objectives of investment treaties are not necessarily in tension with other 'non-economic' objectives. These findings have important implications for the drafting and interpretation of investment treaties.