Name: The Economic Realities of Political Reform: Elections and the us Senate (Murphy Institute Studies in Political Economy) (en Inglés)
Price: 111230.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: James L. Regens; Ronald Keith Gaddie
ISBN: 9780521474689

portada The Economic Realities of Political Reform: Elections and the us Senate (Murphy Institute Studies in Political Economy) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

James L. Regens; Ronald Keith Gaddie

Año

1995

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

134

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

052147468x

ISBN13

9780521474689

Categorías

Economía

The Economic Realities of Political Reform: Elections and the us Senate (Murphy Institute Studies in Political Economy) (en Inglés)

James L. Regens; Ronald Keith Gaddie (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 111.230

$ 185.390

Ahorras: $ 74.160

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 29 de Mayo y el Lunes 10 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Economic Realities of Political Reform: Elections and the us Senate (Murphy Institute Studies in Political Economy) (en Inglés)"

A central political issue in American politics during the 1990s is the need for political campaign reform. The authors examine US Senate elections to determine the role money plays in Senate elections; their analysis indicates that the system of campaign finance resembles a market, with legislators as the recipients of financial largesse based on their institutional positions and political vulnerability. This rent-seeking relationship between economic interests and legislators has transformed the dynamic of Senate elections. The authors assess the potential impact of several electoral reform proposals. Spending limits and public funding proposals, they argue, will not have the impact expected by reform advocates. Term limit and public funding proposals would disrupt the rent-seeking relationship between legislators and economic interests. These proposals also face political and constitutional barriers to implementation.