Name: The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’S Rainbow (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law) (en Inglés)
Price: 69170.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Wilberg Hanna (Edt); Elliott Mark (Edt)
ISBN: 9781509917044

portada The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’S Rainbow (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Hart Publishing

Autor

Wilberg Hanna (Edt); Elliott Mark (Edt)

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

444

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781509917044

The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’S Rainbow (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law) (en Inglés)

Wilberg Hanna (Edt); Elliott Mark (Edt) (Autor) · Hart Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

$ 69.170

$ 125.770

Ahorras: $ 56.600

45% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 17 de Junio y el Jueves 27 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’S Rainbow (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law) (en Inglés)"

Inspired by the work of Professor Michael Taggart, this collection of essays from across the common law world is concerned with two separate but related themes. First, to what extent and by what means should review on substantive grounds such as unreasonableness be expanded and intensified? Jowell, Elliott and Varuhas all agree with Taggart that proportionality should not 'sweep the rainbow', but propose different schemes for organising and conceptualising substantive review. Groves and Weeks, and Hoexter evaluate the state of substantive review in Australia and South Africa respectively.The second theme concerns the broader (Canadian) sense of substantive review including the illegality grounds, and whether deference should extend to these grounds. Cane and Aronson consider the relevance and impact of different constitutional and doctrinal settings. Wilberg and Daly address questions concerning when and how deference is to operate once it is accepted as appropriate in principle.Rights-based review is discussed in a separate third part because it raises both of the above questions. Geiringer, Sales and Walters examine the choices to be made in settling the approach in this area, each focusing on a different dichotomy.Taggart's work is notable for treating these various aspects of substantive review as parts of a broader whole, and for his search for an appropriate balance between judicial scrutiny and administrative autonomy across this entire area. By bringing together essays on all these topics, this volume seeks to build on that approach.