Name: The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order: National Identities, Bilateral Relations, and East Versus West in the 2010S (en Inglés)
Price: 74080.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Gilbert Rozman
ISBN: 9780804791014

portada The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order: National Identities, Bilateral Relations, and East Versus West in the 2010S (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Stanford University Press

Autor

Gilbert Rozman

Año

2014

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

264

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9780804791014

N° edición

Categorías

Política comparada

The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order: National Identities, Bilateral Relations, and East Versus West in the 2010S (en Inglés)

Gilbert Rozman (Autor) · Stanford University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 74.080

$ 148.160

Ahorras: $ 74.080

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 19 de Junio y el Miércoles 26 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order: National Identities, Bilateral Relations, and East Versus West in the 2010S (en Inglés)"

The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order is the third volume in Gilbert Rozman's trilogy on national identity. The first two volumes, edited by Gilbert Rozman, concerned the identities of three East Asian countries: China, Japan, and South Korea. These books analyzed how these countries' national identities suffered through their relation to modernization, and examined how the national identity of each differed from the other two and how those differences were shaped by the relation of each country to the United States. In this third volume, Rozman examines Russia together with China. The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order argues that China and Russia's national identities are much closer to each other than usually thought, and are growing even closer. Moreover, the closeness of their identities comes neither from their prerevolutionary pasts nor from today's practical politics, but rather from habits carried over from their communist periods, even though the ideological dimensions of their identities have weakened since 1990.