Name: When Dissents Matter: Judicial Dialogue Through us Supreme Court Opinions (Constitutionalism and Democracy) (en Inglés)
Price: 44970.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Pamela C. Corley; Amy Steigerwalt; Artemus Ward
ISBN: 9780813950174

portada When Dissents Matter: Judicial Dialogue Through us Supreme Court Opinions (Constitutionalism and Democracy) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

University Of Virginia Press

Autor

Pamela C. Corley; Amy Steigerwalt; Artemus Ward

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

180

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9780813950174

When Dissents Matter: Judicial Dialogue Through us Supreme Court Opinions (Constitutionalism and Democracy) (en Inglés)

Pamela C. Corley; Amy Steigerwalt; Artemus Ward (Autor) · University Of Virginia Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

$ 44.970

$ 89.930

Ahorras: $ 44.960

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 06 de Junio y el Martes 18 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "When Dissents Matter: Judicial Dialogue Through us Supreme Court Opinions (Constitutionalism and Democracy) (en Inglés)"

The ability of US Supreme Court justices to dissent from the majority, to formally register and explain their belief that a case has been wrongly decided, represents a time-honored tradition of perhaps the most august American institution. Yet the impact of these dissents, which allow justices to engage in a dialogue over law and policy, has seldom, if ever, been the focus of dedicated study. Analyzing the influence of dissents on Supreme Court majority opinions, this book presents the first comprehensive study of the effects of dissenting opinions and illuminates which types of dissents successfully influence legal and policy debates, which ones fail to make a difference, and why.Drawing on the private papers of the justices and original data, this book demonstrates that court majorities engage with dissents posing a particular threat to their opinions, and that they can be persuaded by thoughtful and careful dissenting arguments.