Name: Citizenship and the American Revolution: A Resolute Tory's Abiding Status, Transactions, American Philosophical Society (Vol. 106, Part 3) (en Inglés)
SKU: 57162891
Price: 37640.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Maxey, David W.
ISBN: 9781606180631

portada Citizenship and the American Revolution: A Resolute Tory's Abiding Status, Transactions, American Philosophical Society (Vol. 106, Part 3) (en Inglés)

Citizenship and the American Revolution: A Resolute Tory's Abiding Status, Transactions, American Philosophical Society (Vol. 106, Part 3) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

David W. Maxey

Editorial

American Philosophical Society Press

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

102

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781606180631

Categorías

Constitución

Citizenship and the American Revolution: A Resolute Tory's Abiding Status, Transactions, American Philosophical Society (Vol. 106, Part 3) (en Inglés)

David W. Maxey (Autor) · American Philosophical Society Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 12 a 17 días háb.

$ 68.440$ 37.640

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 37.640

Llega entre el 01 Oct y el 08 Oct a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Citizenship and the American Revolution: A Resolute Tory's Abiding Status, Transactions, American Philosophical Society (Vol. 106, Part 3) (en Inglés)"

When did a person living in one of the rebellious colonies cease to be the subject of George III and become a citizen of a newly constituted American state? Well into the 19th cent., uncertainty persisted regarding citizenship acquired (or lost) during the Revolution. Turning to original sources, Maxey brings into clear focus a family dispute over inheritance rights and the task the Supreme Court faced in determining the status of Daniel Coxe -- either as a citizen of New Jersey entitled to inherit, or as an alien barred from doing so. Having heard the arguments on two separate occasions, the Supreme Court announced its decision in 1808. Twenty years later, the Court measurably diverged from the rationale supporting that decision. Illus.