Name: Colonial Theories of Institutional Development: Toward a Model of Styles of Imperialism (Contributions to Economics) (en Inglés)
Price: 141280.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Daniel Oto-Peralías; Diego Romero-Ávila
ISBN: 9783319853253

portada Colonial Theories of Institutional Development: Toward a Model of Styles of Imperialism (Contributions to Economics) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Springer

Autor

Daniel Oto-Peralías; Diego Romero-Ávila

Año

2018

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

146

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9783319853253

Categorías

Economía

Colonial Theories of Institutional Development: Toward a Model of Styles of Imperialism (Contributions to Economics) (en Inglés)

Daniel Oto-Peralías; Diego Romero-Ávila (Autor) · Springer · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 141.280

$ 235.470

Ahorras: $ 94.190

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 28 de Mayo y el Viernes 07 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Colonial Theories of Institutional Development: Toward a Model of Styles of Imperialism (Contributions to Economics) (en Inglés)"

This book analyzes the role played by initial endowments and colonizer identity in seeking to explain institutional development in former colonies. It presents a model of two styles of imperialism that integrates the colonial origin and endowment views explaining current institutions. The authors argue that Great Britain and Portugal adopted an ‘economically-oriented’ style, which was pragmatic and sensitive to initial conditions. For this style of imperialism the endowment view is applicable. In contrast, France employed a ‘politically-oriented’ style of imperialism, in which ideological and political motivations were more present. This led to a uniform colonial policy that largely disregarded initial endowments. In turn, the case of Spain represents a hybrid of the two models. The empirical analysis presented here reveals a remarkable degree of heterogeneity in the relationship of endowments and colonizer identity with current institutions.