Name: Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing (en Inglés)
Price: 61950.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Balinski, Michel ; Laraki, Rida
ISBN: 9780262545716

portada Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing (en Inglés)

Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Michel Balinski

Rida Laraki

Editorial

MIT Press

Año

2022

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

432

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 2.2 cm

Peso

0.58 kg.

ISBN13

9780262545716

Categorías

Sociología
Elecciones y referéndums
Campañas y publicidad políticas
Econometría

Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing (en Inglés)

Michel Balinski (Autor) · Rida Laraki (Autor) · MIT Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 12 a 16 días háb.

$ 123.890$ 61.950

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 50 unidades

$ 61.950

Llega entre el 12 Ago y el 18 Ago a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing (en Inglés)"

An account of a new theory and method of voting, judging and ranking, majority judgment, shown to be superior to all other known methods. In Majority Judgment, Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki argue that the traditional theory of social choice offers no acceptable solution to the problems of how to elect, to judge, or to rank. They find that the traditional model--transforming the preference lists of individuals into a preference list of society--is fundamentally flawed in both theory and practice. Balinski and Laraki propose a more realistic model. It leads to an entirely new theory and method--majority judgment--proven superior to all known methods. It is at once meaningful, resists strategic manipulation, elicits honesty, and is not subject to the classical paradoxes encountered in practice, notably Condorcet's and Arrow's. They offer theoretical, practical, and experimental evidence--from national elections to figure skating competitions--to support their arguments. Drawing on insights from wine, sports, music, and other competitions, Balinski and Laraki argue that the question should not be how to transform many individual rankings into a single collective ranking, but rather, after defining a common language of grades to measure merit, how to transform the many individual evaluations of each competitor into a single collective evaluation of all competitors. The crux of the matter is a new model in which the traditional paradigm--to compare--is replaced by a new paradigm--to evaluate.