Name: Pierson v. Post, the Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture (Cambridge Historical Studies in American law and Society) (en Inglés)
Price: 185850.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Angela Fernandez
ISBN: 9781107039285

portada Pierson v. Post, the Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture (Cambridge Historical Studies in American law and Society) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

Angela Fernandez

Año

2018

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

392

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781107039285

Categorías

Derecho administrativo y administraciones públicas

Pierson v. Post, the Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture (Cambridge Historical Studies in American law and Society) (en Inglés)

Angela Fernandez (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 185.850

$ 285.930

Ahorras: $ 100.080

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 19 de Junio y el Miércoles 26 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Pierson v. Post, the Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture (Cambridge Historical Studies in American law and Society) (en Inglés)"

The 1805 New York foxhunting case Pierson v. Post has long been used in American property law classrooms to introduce law students to the concept of first possession by asking how one establishes possession of a wild animal. In this book, Professor Angela Fernandez retells the history of the famous fox case, from its origins as a squabble between two wealthy young men on the South Fork of Long Island through its appeal to the New York Supreme Court and entry into legal treatises, law school casebooks, and law journal articles, where it still occupies a central place. Professor Fernandez argues that the dissent is best understood as an example of legal solemn foolery. Yet it has been treated by legal professionals, the lawyers of its day, and subsequent legal academics in such a serious way, demonstrating how the solemn and the silly can occupy two sides of the same coin in American legal history.