Name: Religion and Economics: Normative Social Theory (en Inglés)
SKU: 58606206
Price: 161880.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Dean, J. M. ; Waterman, Anthony Michael C.
ISBN: 9789401058919

portada Religion and Economics: Normative Social Theory (en Inglés)

Religion and Economics: Normative Social Theory (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Springer

Autor

Dean, J. M. ; Waterman, Anthony Michael C.

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

205

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

23.4x15.6x1.2 cm

Peso

0.31 kg.

ISBN13

9789401058919

Categorías

Teoría y filosofía económicas
Microeconomía
Historia de la economía

Religion and Economics: Normative Social Theory (en Inglés)

Dean, J. M. ; Waterman, Anthony Michael C. (Autor) · Springer · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 12 a 17 días háb.

$ 294.330$ 161.880

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 161.880

Llega entre el 02 Oct y el 09 Oct a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Religion and Economics: Normative Social Theory (en Inglés)"

Normative Social Theory James M. Dean and A. M. C. Waterman University of Manitoba 1. Economics and Religion Once Again This hook is a sequel to Economics and Religion: Are They Distinct? (Brennan and Waterman 1994). That volume was motivated by a frustration born of many disappointing encounters between economists and theologians in the 1980s. Can bishops, synods, and other voices of organized religion bring any interesting (and disinterested) contribution to the public policy debate? If so, what is the relation of their contribution to that of the purely "secular" knowledge economists believe they can supply? Can economists bring any interesting (and disinterested) contribution to the public policy debate? If so, what is the relation of their contribution to the fundamental values that inform social ethics and that are still guarded to a large extent by religious tradition? All too often the two sides talked at cross-purposes. Well-intentioned economists coexisted for a few hours or days with well- intentioned theologians whose manner of conceiving social reality was radically incompatible with their own. There seemed to be no common ground. The first requisite of any genuine conversation is an agreed conceptual framework that is able to accommodate the peculiar social vision both of the economist and of theologian, and to display the logical relation between the two.