Name: Respecting State Courts: The Inevitability of Judicial Federalism (en Inglés)
Price: 120380.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Michael E. Solimine; James L. Walker
ISBN: 9780313306341

portada Respecting State Courts: The Inevitability of Judicial Federalism (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Praeger

Autor

Michael E. Solimine; James L. Walker

Año

1999

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

184

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

0313306346

ISBN13

9780313306341

Categorías

Derecho constitucional

Respecting State Courts: The Inevitability of Judicial Federalism (en Inglés)

Michael E. Solimine; James L. Walker (Autor) · Praeger · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 120.380

$ 200.630

Ahorras: $ 80.250

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 14 de Mayo y el Jueves 23 de Mayo.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Respecting State Courts: The Inevitability of Judicial Federalism (en Inglés)"

Solimine and Walker provide a comprehensive examination of all the major issues revolving around judicial federalism- the sharing of judicial power between the 50 states and the federal government. They make the case that the existence and operation of this system is healthy for the development of law and the protection of liberty.This theme is developed through a discussion of the major issues in the literature of judicial federalism: federalism and rights, the parity of the state and federal courts, the civil litigation system, state court interpretations of their own constitutions, and the relationship of ideology to judicial federalism. Recognizing that there are and always have been serious shortcomings in this system, the author points out that these problem areas can be remedied; the start of this remedial process necessitates a respect for the judicial institutions of the state. Solimine and Walker envision the beginning of a dialogue among practitioners, academics, and concerned citizens on how best to improve the current system in order to halt the threats to diversity posed by increasing federal domination of the judicial system.