Name: Terrorism: Section by Section Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act (en Inglés)
Price: 21830.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: The Library of Congress ; Penny Hill Press
ISBN: 9781535340694

portada Terrorism: Section by Section Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

The Library of Congress

Editorial

Createspace Independent Publishing Platform

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

28.0 x 21.6 x 0.3 cm

Peso

0.17 kg.

ISBN13

9781535340694

Categorías

Terrorismo y lucha armada

Terrorism: Section by Section Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act (en Inglés)

The Library of Congress (Autor) · Createspace Independent Publishing Platform · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

$ 21.830

$ 39.690

Ahorras: $ 17.860

45% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 19 de Junio y el Lunes 01 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Terrorism: Section by Section Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act (en Inglés)"

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act, Public Law 107-56, is part of the Congressional response to September 11. It is the merger of two similar bills. S.1510 passed the Senate on October 11, 147 Cong.Rec. S10604, and H.R.2975 passed the House on October 12 after substituting the language of H.R.3108 for its text, 147 Cong.Rec. H6775. Having informally resolving their differences, the House enacted the measure in final form on October 24, 147 Cong.Rec. H7282, and the Senate on October 25, 147 Cong.Rec. S11059.The report of the House Committee on the judiciary, H.Rept. 107-236 on H.R.2975, and the report of the House Committee on Financial Services, H.Rept. 107-250 on H.R. 3004, each explain some of the issues ultimately resolved in the Act. This is a section by section analysis of the Act as enacted. The analysis borrows the explanations of the House Committee of the Judiciary, in a number of those instances where the language of the Committee bill and the language of the Act are identical.