Name: The Price Effects of Hospital Mergers: A Case Study of the Sutter-Summit Transaction (en Inglés)
Price: 23050.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Federal Trade Commission
ISBN: 9781502493859

portada The Price Effects of Hospital Mergers: A Case Study of the Sutter-Summit Transaction (en Inglés)

The Price Effects of Hospital Mergers: A Case Study of the Sutter-Summit Transaction (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Createspace

Autor

Federal Trade Commission

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

28.0 x 21.6 x 0.2 cm

Peso

0.10 kg.

ISBN13

9781502493859

Categorías

Sistemas y servicios de salud
Medicina popular y salud

The Price Effects of Hospital Mergers: A Case Study of the Sutter-Summit Transaction (en Inglés)

Federal Trade Commission (Autor) · Createspace · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 17 a 22 días háb.

$ 46.090$ 23.050

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 23.050

Llega entre el 11 Ago y el 18 Ago a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The Price Effects of Hospital Mergers: A Case Study of the Sutter-Summit Transaction (en Inglés)"

This consummated merger combined two hospitals located close together in the Oakland-Berkeley region of the San Francisco Bay Area. The greater metropolitan area contained many other hospitals that offered a similar range of services, but which were located farther away. A central issue raised by the Sutter-Summit transaction was whether travel costs were low enough such that these hospitals were a sufficient constraint on the merging parties to prevent an anticompetitive price increase. We use detailed claims data from three large health insurers to compare the post-merger price change for the merging parties to the price change for a set of control group hospitals. Our results show that Summit's price increase was among the largest of any comparable hospital in California, indicating this transaction may have been anticompetitive.