Name: Why It's ok to not be Monogamous (en Inglés)
SKU: 55653416
Price: 210020.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Justin L. Clardy
ISBN: 9781032450193

portada Why It's ok to not be Monogamous (en Inglés)

Why It's ok to not be Monogamous (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

Justin L. Clardy

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

162

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781032450193

N° edición

Why It's ok to not be Monogamous (en Inglés)

Justin L. Clardy (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 20 a 24 días háb.

$ 420.030$ 210.020

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 210.020

Llega entre el 19 Oct y el 23 Oct a Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Why It's ok to not be Monogamous (en Inglés)"

The downsides of monogamy are felt by most people engaged in long-term relationships, including restrictions on self-discovery, limits on friendship, sexual boredom, and a circumscribed understanding of intimacy. Yet, a "happily ever after" monogamy is assumed to be the ideal form of romantic love in many modern societies: a relationship that is morally ideal and will bring the most happiness to its two partners. In Why It's OK to Not Be Monogamous, Justin L. Clardy deeply questions these assumptions. He rejects the claim that non-monogamy among honest, informed and consenting adults is morally impermissible. He shows instead how polyamorous relationships can actually be exemplars of moral virtue. The book discusses how social and political forces sustain and reward monogamous relationships. The book defines non-monogamy as a privative concept; a negation of monogamy. Looking at its prevalence in the United States, the book explains how common criticisms of non-monogamy come up short. Clardy argues, as some researchers have recently shown--monogamy relies on continually demonizing non-monogamy to sustain its moral status. Finally, the book concludes with a focus on equality, asking what justice for polyamorous individuals might look like.