Name: Analysing the position of Substitute Councillor for the Courts of Auditors (en Inglés)
Price: 69230.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Dias Da Cunha, Milene
ISBN: 9786206357728

portada Analysing the position of Substitute Councillor for the Courts of Auditors (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Milene Dias Da Cunha

Editorial

Our Knowledge Publishing

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 0.5 cm

Peso

0.13 kg.

ISBN13

9786206357728

Categorías

Contratos públicos
Derecho público

Analysing the position of Substitute Councillor for the Courts of Auditors (en Inglés)

Milene Dias Da Cunha (Autor) · Our Knowledge Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 69.230

$ 96.150

Ahorras: $ 26.920

28% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 02 de Agosto y el Miércoles 14 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Analysing the position of Substitute Councillor for the Courts of Auditors (en Inglés)"

The position of Substitute Councillor was given constitutional status by the Federal Constitution of 1988, which establishes judicial attributions for the position in Article 73, Paragraph 4. Twenty-six years on from the Federal Charter, there is a lack of uniformity in the treatment of this constitutional position. In many Courts of Auditors, this position only fulfils the function of an expert or typical activities of the auxiliary body. Furthermore, even when they exercise judicial powers, i.e. when they preside over procedural investigations, reporting on the cases distributed with a proposed decision to be submitted to the collegiate body, some Courts do not promote fair and impartial distribution to them. Thus, it can be seen that the limitation of the judicial attributions of the position, by means of rules that assign the issuing of opinions or the exercise of the function of head of the auxiliary body, sometimes confuses the attributions of the position with the accounting sense, sometimes has a political motivation and, therefore, must be recognised as unconstitutional because it does not express the will of the constituent. Similarly, the same defect must be recognised in the rules that deal with the distribution of proceedings using criteria that contravene the principle of a natural judge.