Name: Defense Industrial Base: An Overview of an Emerging Issue: Nsiad-93-68 (en Inglés)
Price: 25610.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
ISBN: 9781287232087

portada Defense Industrial Base: An Overview of an Emerging Issue: Nsiad-93-68 (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Bibliogov

Autor

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.1 cm

Peso

0.06 kg.

ISBN13

9781287232087

Categorías

Política y gobierno

Defense Industrial Base: An Overview of an Emerging Issue: Nsiad-93-68 (en Inglés)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 25.610

$ 42.680

Ahorras: $ 17.070

40% descuento

Cantidad
Estado: Nuevo
Quedan 100+ unidades

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 26 de Junio y el Martes 02 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Defense Industrial Base: An Overview of an Emerging Issue: Nsiad-93-68 (en Inglés)"

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the: (1) existence of a viable U.S. industrial base to meet future defense needs; and (2) access to critical items and capabilities produced or controlled by foreign countries. GAO found that: (1) the Department of Defense's (DOD) strategy to rely on free market forces to restructure the defense industrial base is not realistic, since DOD is responsible for developing and implementing defense policy and industrial base requirements; (2) many defense contractors do not have the experience needed to shift between commercial and military production; (3) DOD has greater expertise and access to defense industry related information to assess factors affecting the industrial base, such as international political developments, emerging military threats, and future development of defense-related technology and military doctrine; (4) although DOD is implementing guidance to ensure that critical defense capabilities will not be lost, it has not taken a proactive role in ensuring access to critical items and capabilities or assessed U.S. reliance on foreign sources for its defense needs; and (5) DOD systematic reviews did not maintain data on lower production firms that provide specialized technology, lacked information and criteria for determining acceptable levels of foreign dependence, and failed to address present and future U.S. competitiveness in critical technological areas.