Name: Literary Criticism, Culture and the Subject of 'english': F. R. Leavis and T. Su Eliot (Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Literature) (en Inglés)
Price: 39030.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Dandan Zhang
ISBN: 9780367552572

portada Literary Criticism, Culture and the Subject of 'english': F. R. Leavis and T. Su Eliot (Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Literature) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

Dandan Zhang

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

198

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9780367552572

N° edición

Literary Criticism, Culture and the Subject of 'english': F. R. Leavis and T. Su Eliot (Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Literature) (en Inglés)

Dandan Zhang (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 39.030

$ 78.050

Ahorras: $ 39.020

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 21 de Junio y el Viernes 05 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Literary Criticism, Culture and the Subject of 'english': F. R. Leavis and T. Su Eliot (Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Literature) (en Inglés)"

This volume considers the highly convoluted relationship between F. R. Leavis and T. S. Eliot, comparing their ideas in literary and cultural criticism, and connecting it to the broader discourse of English Studies as a university subject that developed in the first half of the twentieth century. Comparing and contrasting all the many writings of Leavis on Eliot, and the two on Lawrence, the study examines how Eliot is formative for the theory and practice of Leavis's literary criticism in both positive and negative ways, and investigates Lawrence's significance in relation to Leavis's changing attitude to Eliot. It also examines how profound differences in social, cultural, religious and national thinking strengthened Leavis's alliance with Lawrence to the detriment of his relationship with Eliot. These differences between the two writers are presented as dichotomies between nationalism and Europeanism/internationalism, ruralism/organicism and industrialism/metropolitanism, and relate to the two men's views on literary education, the subject of 'English' and the position of the Classics in the curriculum. It explores how Leavis's increasingly conflicted feelings about a figure to whom he owned an enormous critical debt and inspiration, but whose various beliefs and literary affiliations caused him much misgiving, result in a deep sense of division in Leavis himself which he sought to transfer onto Eliot as what he called a pathological 'case'.