Name: Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency (Studies in Asian Security) (en Inglés)
Price: 52520.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: J. J. (Edt) Suh
ISBN: 9780804749794

portada Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency (Studies in Asian Security) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Stanford University Press

Autor

J. J. (Edt) Suh

Año

2004

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

288

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Peso

0.90

ISBN

0804749795

ISBN13

9780804749794

N° edición

Categorías

Guerra y defensa bélica

Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency (Studies in Asian Security) (en Inglés)

J. J. (Edt) Suh (Autor) · Stanford University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 52.520

$ 72.950

Ahorras: $ 20.430

28% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 13 de Junio y el Martes 25 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency (Studies in Asian Security) (en Inglés)"

Is East Asia heading toward war? Throughout the 1990s, conventional wisdom among U.S. scholars of international relations held that institutionalized cooperation in Europe fosters peace, while its absence from East Asia portends conflict. Developments in Europe and Asia in the 1990s contradict the conventional wisdom without discrediting it. Explanations that derive from only one paradigm or research program have shortcomings beyond their inability to recognize important empirical anomalies. International relations research is better served by combining explanatory approaches from different research traditions. This book makes a case for a new theoretical approach (called “analytical eclecticism” by the authors) to the study of Asian security. It informs the analysis in subsequent chapters of central topics in East Asian security, with specific reference to China, Japan, Korea, and Southeast Asia. The authors conclude that the prospects for peace in East Asia look less dire than conventional―in many cases Eurocentric―theories of international relations suggest. At the same time, they point to a number of potentially destabilizing political developments.