Name: setting standards for financial reporting: fasb and the struggle for control of a critical process (en Inglés)
Price: 232950.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Van Riper, Robert
ISBN: 9780899309071

portada setting standards for financial reporting: fasb and the struggle for control of a critical process (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Robert Van Riper

Editorial

Praeger

Año

1994

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

216

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

24.1 x 16.2 x 2.2 cm

Peso

0.53 kg.

ISBN

0899309070

ISBN13

9780899309071

Categorías

Contabilidad
Finanzas

setting standards for financial reporting: fasb and the struggle for control of a critical process (en Inglés)

Robert Van Riper (Autor) · Praeger · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 232.950

$ 323.540

Ahorras: $ 90.590

28% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 04 de Julio y el Martes 16 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "setting standards for financial reporting: fasb and the struggle for control of a critical process (en Inglés)"

The book begins with an overview of how and why the present self-regulatory arrangement for setting standards for financial reporting in the private sector came about in 1973. A brief description of the new structure is followed by a discussion of the essential elements of meaningful self-regulation. A schism emerged between advocates of neutrality and objectivity in standard setting and those who think the primary concern should be for possible economic and social consequences. Early clashes between traditional views and newer insights are described, setting the stage for an account of serious resistance to change. Powerful interests mount determined efforts to thwart the standard setters, undercutting not only self-regulation, but also the intent of the federal securities acts of 1933 and 1934. The practical and philosophical bases for the opposing views are examined, and recommendations are presented for ensuring continuation of private-sector standard setting despite the intensity of these views.