Compartir
The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés)
John W. Mcginley (Autor)
·
Iuniverse
· Tapa Blanda
The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés) - John W. Mcginley
$ 39.780
$ 55.250
Ahorras: $ 15.470
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Viernes 28 de Junio y el
Miércoles 10 de Julio.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés)"
Yes, that's right. The writings of Plato do NOT all fit together in harmony, irrespective of the question of chronological development. To be sure, one is just ice-skating over the surface of Platonic writings if one does not have a nuanced understanding of the various periods of Plato's intellectual development over time. The incongruity in his writings which is a function of this multi-faceted intellectual development over time can, however, be sufficiently delineated. But there is another kind of incongruity which, especially in Plato's case, could never be and in fact never was explainable through a nuanced accounting of Plato's long and ever-revising intellectual development. The writings of Plato could never have been anything other than incongruous in this more fundamental sense, Plato being Plato. For Plato being Plato, early and or middle and or later, IS precisely this: Plato contra Plato. But more than that, "the good itself" [[i.e., Plato's eventual teaching on the good
