Name: The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? (Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law) (en Inglés)
Price: 182260.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Polanco, Rodrigo
ISBN: 9781108473385

portada The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? (Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Rodrigo Polanco

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Año

2019

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

372

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

23.4 x 19.1 x 2.3 cm

Peso

0.64 kg.

ISBN13

9781108473385

Categorías

Derecho internacional
Derecho del mercado bursátil

The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? (Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law) (en Inglés)

Rodrigo Polanco (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 182.260

$ 303.760

Ahorras: $ 121.500

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 31 de Mayo y el Viernes 07 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? (Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law) (en Inglés)"

This book advances the idea that in order to address some of the criticisms against investor-state dispute settlement, a large majority of states have taken a 'normative' strategy, negotiating or amending investment treaties with provisions that potentially give more control and greater involvement to the contracting parties, and notably the home state. This is particularly true of agreements concluded in the past fifteen years. At the same time, there is a potential revival of the 'remnants' of diplomatic protection that are embedded in investment treaties since the beginning of the system. But why is the home state being brought back into a domain from which it was expressly excluded several decades ago? Why would a home state be interested in intervening in these conflicts? Is this 'new' role of the home state in foreign investment disputes a 'return' to diplomatic protection of its nationals, or are we witnessing something different?